You're as obsessed with the facts as we are!
Subscribe to our free newsletter and get the latest stories straight to your inbox every Tuesday.
Indepth News about Wyoming People, Places & Policy. Wyoming news.
Thanks for your support of WyoFile! We rely on loyal members like you to sustain our reporting and grow the WyoFile community.
The seven Colorado River states — Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming — face a daunting mid-August deadline. The federal government has asked them to come up with a plan to reduce their combined water usage from the Colorado River by up to 4 million acre-feet in 2023.
Want more WyoFile? Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay informed on the stories that matter most.
That is a massive reduction for a river system that currently produces about 12.4 million acre-feet. The Bureau of Reclamation, which manages the Colorado River, warned that it will “act unilaterally to protect the system” if the states cannot come up with an adequate plan on their own.
The seven states have worked cooperatively over the past two decades to identify solutions to a shrinking river. But their response now, much like the global response to climate change, seems far from adequate to the enormous challenge.
You rely on us for the facts. We rely on readers like you to keep our reporters in the field unearthing the stories that matter to you. Make a donation today and help us keep digging.
In a recent letter to BuRec, the Upper Colorado River Commission, speaking for the four Upper Basin states, proposed a plan that adopts a business-as-usual, “drought-reduction” approach. They argue that their options are limited because “previous drought response actions are depleting upstream storage by 661,000 feet.”
The Commission complains that water users “already suffer chronic shortages under current conditions resulting in uncompensated priority administration, which includes cuts to numerous present perfected rights in each of our states.”
This leads the Commission to conclude that any future reductions must come largely from Mexico and the Lower Basin states of Arizona, California and Nevada, because they use most of the water.
The Upper Basin Commission’s anemic response to BuRec’s plea is not a serious plan. We can do better and we must.
But the Lower Basin states have already taken a significant hit to their “present perfected rights,” and if BuRec makes good on its promise to act unilaterally, they will face another big reduction. The cooperative relationship among the Basin states will not endure if the Upper Basin refuses to share the burden by reducing its consumption.
A good place to start might lie with two Colorado projects to divert water from the Colorado River basin to the Front Range. Both began construction this summer. The Gross Reservoir Expansion Project will triple the size of one of Denver Water’s major storage units. Denver Water’s original justification for this project — to serve Denver’s growing urban population — seems odd given that water demand in their service area over the past two decades has shrunk, even as its population rose by nearly 300,000.
WyoFile aims to provide you with the tools to make informed decisions by producing independent, unbiased reporting that is free and accessible to all. Donate today to help keep Wyoming empowered and informed.
Similar questions have been raised with the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District’s Windy Gap Firming Project, which plans to store Colorado River water to support population growth in Front Range cities.
These two projects suggest that Colorado is prepared to exacerbate the current crisis when the opposite response is so desperately needed.
Abandoning these two projects would signal that Colorado is serious about giving the Colorado River a fighting chance at survival. It might also jump-start good-faith negotiations over how Mexico, the states, and tribes might work to achieve a long-term solution to this crisis.
The homestead laws of the 19th century attracted a resilient group of farmers to the West who cleverly designed water laws to secure their water rights against all future water users. “First in time, first in right” became the governing mantra of water allocation, because, except for Tribal Nations, the farmers were first.
That system worked well for many years. As communities grew, cities and water districts built reservoirs to store the spring runoff, ensuring that water was available throughout the irrigation season.
Climate change and mega-droughts have upended that system. Nowhere have the consequences been as dire as in the Colorado River Basin. America’s two largest reservoirs, Lake Powell and Lake Mead — key components of the Colorado River’s water storage system — have not filled for more than two decades. They now sit well below 30% of their capacity.
Hotter temperatures, less mountain snowpack and dry soils that soak up runoff like a sponge have brought us to this seven-state crisis. All seven states must now share the pain of addressing this crisis.
The Upper Basin Commission’s anemic response to BuRec’s plea is not a serious plan. We can do better and we must.
This piece was originally published by Writers on the Range, a nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about Western issues, and reprinted here with permission.
Mark Squillace and Quinn Harper are contributors to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. Mark Squillace is the... More by Mark Squillace and Quinn Harper
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
{{#message}}{{{message}}}{{/message}}{{^message}}Your submission failed. The server responded with {{status_text}} (code {{status_code}}). Please contact the developer of this form processor to improve this message. Learn More{{/message}}
{{#message}}{{{message}}}{{/message}}{{^message}}It appears your submission was successful. Even though the server responded OK, it is possible the submission was not processed. Please contact the developer of this form processor to improve this message. Learn More{{/message}}
One of the problems is the government managed forests are so overgrown with trees and undergrowth they interfere with rain even hitting the ground. The underground aquifers are drying up from over pumping. Right now we have zero subsoil moisture. Tremendous amount of water evaporates as well
When lower basin inhabitants give up their lawns, swimming pools, anf hundreds of golf courses, that would go a long way to lessening the burden on farmers, and in turn food prices. Until then…screw them.
Hi quick question can we pump water from ocean for just using for shower and using river for drinking ?
Why can’t they divert water from the Columbia River?
The biggest problem is that farmers/ranchers use (waste) 80% of the colorado’s water on 1800’s watering systems. Other waste is lawns, inefficient plumbing systems and of course golf courses. Our politicians choose to do nothing until there is a crisis. You know, re-election first, solutions come later when they are out of office.
the compact was written when water was a commodity not a necessity.
wyoming is going to suffer because the other states overbuilt especially colorado & california.
these states will have to go vertical for underground aquifers.
This site, like many others, uses cookies to help us improve and customize your experience. All data is private and will not be shared with third parties.